From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
Cc: | Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: ERROR: argument to pg_get_expr() must come from system catalogs |
Date: | 2010-07-16 13:49:28 |
Message-ID: | 14739.1279288168@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> writes:
> On 13/07/10 21:36, Tom Lane wrote:
>> I wasn't terribly happy with that approach to begin with. I think we
>> need to rethink.
> Do you want to go ahead with your plan of changing what's passed in
> FuncInfo? I won't object if you want to do it, but I wouldn't feel
> comfortable with backporting such big changes myself.
I will take a look at it, but not right away. Since we have no
near-term plans for new minor releases, I don't think it's urgent.
> If we continue with the approach I took, we should implement the
> suggestion to create a new data type for this in 9.1. That would be more
> waterproof than the changes I made, if we introduce new ways to call
> functions in the future.
Agreed, that seems like a better solution going forward than either of
the others.
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Kevin Grittner | 2010-07-16 13:55:19 | Re: dividing money by money |
Previous Message | Kevin Grittner | 2010-07-16 13:39:09 | Re: dividing money by money |