From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota(dot)ntt(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | takaram71(at)gmail(dot)com, pgsql-bugs(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: BUG #17767: psql: tab-completion causes warnings when standard_conforming_strings = off |
Date: | 2023-02-02 05:51:07 |
Message-ID: | 1472712.1675317067@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-bugs |
Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota(dot)ntt(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> At Wed, 01 Feb 2023 15:01:34 -0500, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote in
>> I'm having a hard time getting excited about making such a change,
>> TBH. Why is it that you are running with
>> standard_conforming_strings = off and escape_string_warning = on
>> anyway? If you haven't yet converted your apps to support
>> standard-conforming strings, you probably aren't intent on
>> doing so in the near future, so you might as well turn off
>> escape_string_warning. We last worried about silencing such
>> warnings in our client programs more than a dozen years ago;
>> I'm not sure we should still be worried in 2023.
> I personally fine with the current behavior for the same reason as you
> raised. We could enclose completion queries by "BEGIN; SET LOCAL
> standard_... = on;" and "COMMIT;" in exec_query but I think you don't
> like that (and me neither).
Yeah ... also that's problematic if we're in a transaction, especially
an already-failed one.
Eventually I would like to remove the standard_conforming_strings GUC
altogether, primarily for the reason given at the top of gram.y:
* In general, nothing in this file should initiate database accesses
* nor depend on changeable state (such as SET variables). If you do
* database accesses, your code will fail when we have aborted the
* current transaction and are just parsing commands to find the next
* ROLLBACK or COMMIT. If you make use of SET variables, then you
* will do the wrong thing in multi-query strings like this:
* SET constraint_exclusion TO off; SELECT * FROM foo;
* because the entire string is parsed by gram.y before the SET gets
* executed. Anything that depends on the database or changeable state
* should be handled during parse analysis so that it happens at the
* right time not the wrong time.
Now, I don't foresee that actually happening any time soon (and every
report of somebody still using standard_conforming_strings = off
pushes out my idea of when it could happen). But perhaps allowing
minor annoyances like this to go unfixed would start to light a
fire under people to get off of that setting.
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Kyotaro Horiguchi | 2023-02-02 07:45:03 | Re: BUG #17744: Fail Assert while recoverying from pg_basebackup |
Previous Message | Kyotaro Horiguchi | 2023-02-02 05:40:46 | Re: BUG #17767: psql: tab-completion causes warnings when standard_conforming_strings = off |