From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> |
Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Log rotation |
Date: | 2004-03-13 03:32:42 |
Message-ID: | 14697.1079148762@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> writes:
> Did anything ever come from this thread?
> http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2003-05/msg00603.php
> (Heading: "Plan B for log rotation support: borrow Apache code")
Only an entry on my depressingly long personal to-do list :-(
I did take a look at the Apache rotator program, and found that it was
probably more trouble to adopt than it's worth. It seemed to depend on
a lot of configuration and library-routine infrastructure that we don't
share. (No big surprise; I suppose someone trying to pull out a random
bit of our backend code would be at least as unhappy.) I suspect it
would be less trouble, as well as legalistically cleaner, to write our
own from scratch.
Andrew Sullivan offered Afilias' rotator script awhile back also.
I think that works fine if you like a Perl script.
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Jeroen T. Vermeulen | 2004-03-13 03:33:59 | Re: [HACKERS] The Name Game: postgresql.net vs. |
Previous Message | Marty Scholes | 2004-03-13 02:51:06 | Re: rapid degradation after postmaster restart |