| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Greg Stark <gsstark(at)mit(dot)edu> |
| Cc: | Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog(at)svana(dot)org>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Proof of concept COLLATE support with patch |
| Date: | 2005-09-02 15:42:21 |
| Message-ID: | 14696.1125675741@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Greg Stark <gsstark(at)mit(dot)edu> writes:
> I still doesn't get where the hostility towards this functionality comes from.
We're not really willing to say "here is a piece of syntax REQUIRED
BY THE SQL SPEC which we only support on some platforms". readline,
O_DIRECT, and the like are a completely inappropriate analogy, because
those are inherently platform-dependent (and not in the spec).
The objection is fundamentally that a platform-specific implementation
cannot be our long-term goal, and so expending effort on creating one
seems like a diversion. If there were a plan put forward showing how
this is just a useful way-station, and we could see how we'd later get
rid of the glibc dependency without throwing away the work already done,
then it would be a different story.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Zeugswetter Andreas DAZ SD | 2005-09-02 15:43:58 | Re: Call for 7.5 feature completion |
| Previous Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2005-09-02 15:38:10 | Re: Question about explain of index scan |