| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Robert Haas" <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | "Alvaro Herrera" <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, "Simon Riggs" <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, "Andrew Dunstan" <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: [PATCHES] Infrastructure changes for recovery |
| Date: | 2008-10-07 15:05:45 |
| Message-ID: | 14677.1223391945@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches |
"Robert Haas" <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
>>> I'm just grumpy because I can't see a way to do the
>>> patch-on-patch-on-patch that I'll need to make this all work for Nov 1.
>>> So big patch here we come. But that's just the way it is and I'll stop
>>> honking about it.
>>
>> This is one of the problems that DVCSs are supposed to solve ... have
>> you tried Git?
> I think the other problem here is that the difficulty of getting the
> patch landed increases more than linearly with its size.
Yeah. Tools aren't really the key problem there IMHO.
I agree with Simon that it would be a good thing if this patch got
landed before he went on to the next part. But personally I'm a bit
burned out from commitfest and am not eager to go take a third look
at the patch right now. Does anyone else want to review it?
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Simon Riggs | 2008-10-07 15:08:58 | Re: [PATCHES] Infrastructure changes for recovery |
| Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2008-10-07 14:46:28 | Re: [PATCHES] Infrastructure changes for recovery |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Simon Riggs | 2008-10-07 15:08:58 | Re: [PATCHES] Infrastructure changes for recovery |
| Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2008-10-07 14:46:28 | Re: [PATCHES] Infrastructure changes for recovery |