Re:

From: Oliver Dizon <johnoliver(at)rtzassociates(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re:
Date: 2015-01-28 02:03:14
Message-ID: 1466245406.233187.1422410594679.JavaMail.root@mail
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

Oliver Dizon <johnoliver(at)rtzassociates(dot)com> writes:
> Hi Guys,
> I hope I'm in the right place to throw this. I just want to ask the reason behind this weird scenario.

> All records were deleted in a table even if the subquery in the where clause has a missing a column.

> --from a certain script where table_id is not yet existing on table_sample

> delete from main_table_sample where table_id in (select table_id from table_sample);

> Im expecting that postgres will return an ERROR message like
> 'column "table_id" does not exist on table table_sample'

> Read up on "outer references" in SQL sub-selects. This query is entirely
> legal, although it doesn't do what you want.

> regards, tom lane

It is indeed an example of outer references. I guess I should used aliases for tables in constructing queries with sub-selects to avoid this instance.

Thanks!

In response to

  • Re: at 2015-01-27 14:52:36 from Tom Lane

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Oliver Dizon 2015-01-28 02:07:51 Re: (unknown)
Previous Message Jeremy Palmer 2015-01-28 00:30:21 Re: SSO Windows-to-unix