Re: Libpq Asynchronous Command Processing

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Alonso García , Bruno Elier <bealonso(at)indra(dot)es>
Cc: Craig Ringer <craig(at)postnewspapers(dot)com(dot)au>, Giles Lean <giles(dot)lean(at)pobox(dot)com>, "pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Libpq Asynchronous Command Processing
Date: 2010-05-31 16:47:24
Message-ID: 14657.1275324444@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

=?iso-8859-1?Q?Alonso_Garc=EDa_=2C_Bruno_Elier?= <bealonso(at)indra(dot)es> writes:
> Yes. If I use PQexec, both 7.4 and 8.3 produce a quick result but I if I use asynchronous command processing 8.3 produce a slow result whereas 7.4 works fine.

You're still being quite unclear. Is this 7.4 libpq + 7.4 server
against 8.3 libpq + 8.3 server, or some cross-version combination?
Have you tried switching to the other library version?

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2010-05-31 16:48:41 Re: Trouble with timestamp in PQprepare/PQexecPrepared
Previous Message Viktor Pavlenko 2010-05-31 16:40:34 Trouble with timestamp in PQprepare/PQexecPrepared