Re: Partitioned postgres tables don't need update trigger??

From: rverghese <riyav(at)hotmail(dot)com>
To: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Partitioned postgres tables don't need update trigger??
Date: 2016-06-03 21:54:36
Message-ID: 1464990876552-5906415.post@n5.nabble.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

Perfect! Thanks for the response! Just wanted to make sure I wasn't missing
anything.

--
View this message in context: http://postgresql.nabble.com/Partitioned-postgres-tables-don-t-need-update-trigger-tp5906403p5906415.html
Sent from the PostgreSQL - general mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Greg Navis 2016-06-04 09:50:44 Re: [pg_trgm] Making similarity(?, ?) < ? use an index
Previous Message David G. Johnston 2016-06-03 21:51:09 Re: Partitioned postgres tables don't need update trigger??