Re: Switching roles as an replacement of connection pooling tools

From: CN <cnliou9(at)fastmail(dot)fm>
To: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Switching roles as an replacement of connection pooling tools
Date: 2016-06-01 13:07:31
Message-ID: 1464786451.556435.624726817.5B58E3ED@webmail.messagingengine.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On Tue, May 31, 2016, at 10:23 PM, Melvin Davidson wrote:
> That being said, IMHO, I believe having a separate schema for every
> user is poor database design

This is the best arrangement I can think of now for my use case:

1. Each schema holds an application independent from other schemas
within the same database.
2. Each schema is fully controlled by a role who is responsible for the
development of that application.

Best Regards,
CN

--
http://www.fastmail.com - The professional email service

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message David G. Johnston 2016-06-01 13:45:34 Re: Switching roles as an replacement of connection pooling tools
Previous Message CN 2016-06-01 12:59:19 Re: Switching roles as an replacement of connection pooling tools