| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> |
| Cc: | "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, Marko Kreen <markokr(at)gmail(dot)com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Subject: | Re: Commitfest infrastructure (was Re: 8.4 release planning) |
| Date: | 2009-01-30 01:03:02 |
| Message-ID: | 14637.1233277382@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> writes:
> But that's *not* actually how we do things. So you're making my point.
Well, the stuff around the wiki status board is pretty new and I don't
think anyone feels that it's set in stone yet. The thing we don't want
to compromise on, IMHO, is that the long-term record of what's happened
is in the mailing list archives and *not* in the internal state of some
tool we happen to be using. (One obvious reason for not compromising
on that is that we'd be locked into whatever tool we first pick.)
But it doesn't really matter whether the tool thinks it has archival
state, as long as we can make it link to the archives conveniently.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2009-01-30 01:12:12 | Re: Should IS DISTINCT FROM work with ANY()? |
| Previous Message | Andrew Dunstan | 2009-01-29 22:28:25 | Re: mingw check hung |