From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> |
Cc: | Tatsuo Ishii <ishii(at)postgresql(dot)org>, bruce(at)momjian(dot)us, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: broken doc |
Date: | 2007-08-31 04:06:12 |
Message-ID: | 14619.1188533172@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-docs pgsql-hackers |
Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> writes:
> Tatsuo Ishii wrote
>> Can someone please fix this?
> It's working for me
On Fedora Core 6's sgml toolchain, HEAD builds but un-commenting those
two index entries fails, just as Tatsuo says.
I'm no expert in this, but looking at the complained-of bookindex.sgml
entries makes me think that those index entries have a semantic conflict
with these entries over in indices.sgml:
<indexterm>
<primary>GiST</primary>
<see>index</see>
</indexterm>
<indexterm>
<primary>GIN</primary>
<see>index</see>
</indexterm>
Perhaps we need to have a meeting of the minds on who gets to define the
primary index entries about GiST and GIN?
Peter will probably have a clearer idea about how to fix this ...
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2007-08-31 09:16:40 | Re: [HACKERS] broken doc |
Previous Message | Tatsuo Ishii | 2007-08-31 03:46:05 | Re: broken doc |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Yoshiyuki Asaba | 2007-08-31 06:23:21 | Re: initdb failed on Windows 2000 |
Previous Message | Tatsuo Ishii | 2007-08-31 03:46:05 | Re: broken doc |