From: | "Manuel Lemos" <mlemos(at)acm(dot)org> |
---|---|
To: | "Thomas G(dot) Lockhart" <lockhart(at)alumni(dot)caltech(dot)edu> |
Cc: | pgsql-ports(at)postgreSQL(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: [PORTS] fmgr cache lookup failed on initdb |
Date: | 1999-03-04 20:56:44 |
Message-ID: | 1461.732T2229T12565566@acm.org |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-ports |
Hello Thomas,
On 03-Mar-99 02:52:05, you wrote:
>> >> >> I have ported PostgreSQL to the AmigaOS using a Unix emulation
>> >> >> library.
>As scrappy sez, we are always interested in having solid support for a
>new platform. Is the Unix emulation library available for others
>building on an Amiga platform?
Yes, it's kind of Open Source. If I am not mistaken there is a version of
ixemul for BeOS too. A lot of Unix programs have been ported to Amiga and
BeOS with it, including PostgreSQL 6.1.
>> >> >> PostgreSQL 6.1 work fine but either PostgreSQL 6.2 and 6.4.2
>> >> >> (have) problems on initdb.
>> I noticed that users of other platforms seem to have a similar
>> problem. Can you please tell if any progress was done regarding the
>> mentioned problem?
>The problem is on your machine. I recall that sometimes it is due to
>older executables in the execution path; be sure to wipe all older
>versions (or at least wipe all paths to them) before trying initdb.
Well I tried that but it didn't work. But what exactlt could be causing
that cache access failed error? If I am not mistaken this is not the first
platform it appears on. What exactly does it mean? Maybe I messed with
something in the ported files, but I need more information to try to
determine what happened.
Regards,
Manuel Lemos
E-mail: mlemos(at)acm(dot)org
URL: http://www.e-na.net/the_author.html
PGP key: finger://mlemos(at)zeus(dot)ci(dot)ua(dot)pt
--
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Thomas G. Lockhart | 1999-03-05 06:45:30 | Re: [PORTS] fmgr cache lookup failed on initdb |
Previous Message | The Hermit Hacker | 1999-03-04 17:43:47 | RE: How about a Windows NT port of PostgreSQL |