| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Josh Tolley" <eggyknap(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | "Heikki Linnakangas" <heikki(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, "Magnus Hagander" <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, "Dave Page" <dpage(at)postgresql(dot)org>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: \d omits schema on inherited tables (Was: EXPLAIN omits schema?) |
| Date: | 2007-06-13 17:52:10 |
| Message-ID: | 14609.1181757130@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
"Josh Tolley" <eggyknap(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> On 6/13/07, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>> Yes it does, because that's actually regclass output. It'll be
>> schema-qualified if the table is not visible in your search path.
> I figured it was better to start a new thread, since this changes from
> the original topic. My test didn't display the schema despite the
> parent not being in my search path, as shown below:
Oh, that's what I get for looking at CVS HEAD instead of the 8.2
branch... it was changed here:
http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-committers/2007-02/msg00397.php
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2007-06-13 18:01:38 | Re: EXPLAIN omits schema? |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2007-06-13 17:39:05 | tsearch_core patch: permissions and security issues |