From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Reiner Dassing <dassing(at)wettzell(dot)ifag(dot)de> |
Cc: | pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Restoring a pg_dump fails with |
Date: | 2001-04-30 13:59:26 |
Message-ID: | 14603.988639166@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-admin |
Reiner Dassing <dassing(at)wettzell(dot)ifag(dot)de> writes:
>> Perhaps there is some configuration or platform issue here? What were
>> your configure options?
> The options were as follows:
> ./configure --with-pgport=5432 \
> --with-x \
> --with-perl \
> --with-python \
> --with-tcl \
> --enable-odbc \
> --enable-syslog \
> --with-CC=cc --without-CXX \
> --prefix=/Postgres/pgsql \
> --with-tclconfig=/usr/local/lib \
> --with-include=/usr/local/include
Drat. I was thinking maybe you were using multibyte --- there's some
extra string-slinging for multibyte conversion that might have been a
good place to look for a memory leak. But there's nothing above that
looks significantly different from my setup.
Again, can anyone else reproduce a memory leak during COPY IN?
> There is the table pga_layout.
> What happens if this table is missing, empty or the contents is not
> correct in respect to COPY ...?
Nothing. The backend does not know or care anything about pgaccess'
tables...
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2001-04-30 14:25:50 | Re: Re: disable wal |
Previous Message | Blake, Stephen | 2001-04-30 12:59:58 | RE: Re: 7.1 performance |