Re: Parallel pg_dump's error reporting doesn't work worth squat

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Kyotaro HORIGUCHI <horiguchi(dot)kyotaro(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Parallel pg_dump's error reporting doesn't work worth squat
Date: 2016-05-27 17:20:20
Message-ID: 14603.1464369620@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Kyotaro HORIGUCHI <horiguchi(dot)kyotaro(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp> writes:
> By the way, the reason of the "invalid snapshot identifier" is
> that some worker threads try to use it after the connection on
> the first worker closed.

... BTW, I don't quite see what the issue is there. The snapshot is
exported from the master session, so errors in worker sessions should not
cause such failures in other workers. And I don't see any such failure
when setting up a scenario that will cause a worker to fail on Linux.
The "invalid snapshot identifier" bleats would make sense if you had
gotten a server-side error (and transaction abort) in the master session,
but I don't see any evidence that that happened in that example. Might be
worth seeing if that's reproducible.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Merlin Moncure 2016-05-27 17:53:32 Re: Allow COPY to use parameters
Previous Message Vladimir Borodin 2016-05-27 16:57:34 Re: 9.4 -> 9.5 regression with queries through pgbouncer on RHEL 6