From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Carlos Moreno <moreno_pg(at)mochima(dot)com> |
Cc: | PostgreSQL Performance <pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Feature Request --- was: PostgreSQL Performance Tuning |
Date: | 2007-04-27 14:36:40 |
Message-ID: | 14600.1177684600@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general pgsql-performance |
Carlos Moreno <moreno_pg(at)mochima(dot)com> writes:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>> But
>> the fundamental problem remains that we don't know that much about
>> how the installation will be used.
> Notice that the second part of my suggestion covers this --- have
> additional switches to initdb
That's been proposed and rejected before, too; the main problem being
that initdb is frequently a layer or two down from the user (eg,
executed by initscripts that can't pass extra arguments through, even
assuming they're being invoked by hand in the first place).
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Mark Lewis | 2007-04-27 14:36:52 | Re: Feature Request --- was: PostgreSQL Performance Tuning |
Previous Message | Marcelo de Moraes Serpa | 2007-04-27 14:34:28 | Using a library compiled for 8.3 in 8.2 |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Mark Lewis | 2007-04-27 14:36:52 | Re: Feature Request --- was: PostgreSQL Performance Tuning |
Previous Message | Michael Stone | 2007-04-27 14:30:25 | Re: Feature Request --- was: PostgreSQL Performance Tuning |