Re: NOT EXIST for PREPARE

From: Michael Meskes <meskes(at)postgresql(dot)org>
To: Yury Zhuravlev <u(dot)zhuravlev(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>, Fabrízio de Royes Mello <fabriziomello(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Pgsql Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: NOT EXIST for PREPARE
Date: 2016-03-23 16:07:00
Message-ID: 1458749220.1937.14.camel@postgresql.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> PS Who use ecpg? For me it's like hell. 

More than you think.

I doubt you want to propose removing features that make developing new
features harder, or do you? :)

Michael
--
Michael Meskes
Michael at Fam-Meskes dot De, Michael at Meskes dot (De|Com|Net|Org)
Meskes at (Debian|Postgresql) dot Org
Jabber: michael at xmpp dot meskes dot org
VfL Borussia! Força Barça! SF 49ers! Use Debian GNU/Linux, PostgreSQL

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2016-03-23 16:13:45 Re: Re: Missing rows with index scan when collation is not "C" (PostgreSQL 9.5)
Previous Message Merlin Moncure 2016-03-23 16:06:45 Re: Relax requirement for INTO with SELECT in pl/pgsql