Re: PG 9.1 tentative timeline

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>, "Pr, Solaiyappan (NSN - IN/Bangalore)" <solaiyappan(dot)pr(at)nsn(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: PG 9.1 tentative timeline
Date: 2010-06-13 16:11:49
Message-ID: 14554.1276445509@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> On Sat, Jun 12, 2010 at 1:45 AM, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> wrote:
>> I wrote it down now:
>> http://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/PostgreSQL_9.1_Development_Plan

> Thanks! Looks good, except I thought our plan was to cut alpha1
> before the git switch.

Yes, I thought so too. The page lists those events in the right order,
but now I see the associated dates don't agree.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2010-06-13 16:22:31 Re: Command to prune archive at restartpoints
Previous Message Robert Haas 2010-06-13 16:03:56 Re: PG 9.1 tentative timeline