From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Frans Hals <fhals7(at)googlemail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Paul Ramsey <pramsey(at)cleverelephant(dot)ca>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Large index operation crashes postgres |
Date: | 2010-03-26 16:04:51 |
Message-ID: | 14552.1269619491@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
Frans Hals <fhals7(at)googlemail(dot)com> writes:
> Operation is now running for around 13 hrs.
> Two postmaster processes above 1% memory usage are running.
> One of them uses constantly 26.5% of memory.
> The other one is growing:
> After 1 hr 25%
> After 9 hrs 59%
> After 13 hrs 64%
Well, it's pretty clear that you've found a memory leak, but that was
what we thought before; this data doesn't move us any closer to a fix.
In particular it's not possible to guess whether the leak should be
blamed on Postgres or Postgis code. Even if we knew that, I'm not
sure we could fix the leak without tracing through actual execution.
Can you generate a self-contained test case that exhibits similar bloat?
I would think it's probably not very dependent on the specific data in
the column, so a simple script that constructs a lot of random data
similar to yours might be enough, if you would rather not show us your
real data.
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Paul Ramsey | 2010-03-26 16:25:38 | Re: Large index operation crashes postgres |
Previous Message | akp geek | 2010-03-26 15:59:35 | Re: Error 42501 permission denied for schema |