Re: Support for N synchronous standby servers - take 2

From: kharagesuraj <suraj(dot)kharage(at)nttdata(dot)com>
To: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Support for N synchronous standby servers - take 2
Date: 2016-02-08 05:58:21
Message-ID: 1454911101210-5886259.post@n5.nabble.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

hello,

I have tested v7 patch.
but i think you forgot to remove some debug points in patch from
src/backend/replication/syncrep.c file.

for (i = 0; i < num_sync; i++)
+ {
+ elog(WARNING, "sync_standbys[%d] = %d", i, sync_standbys[i]);
+ }
+ elog(WARNING, "num_sync = %d, s_s_num = %d", num_sync,
synchronous_standby_num);

Please correct my understanding if i am wrong.

Regards
Suraj Kharage

--
View this message in context: http://postgresql.nabble.com/Support-for-N-synchronous-standby-servers-take-2-tp5849384p5886259.html
Sent from the PostgreSQL - hackers mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Pavel Stehule 2016-02-08 06:55:45 Re: proposal: multiple psql option -c
Previous Message Amit Kapila 2016-02-08 05:08:55 Re: WAL Re-Writes