From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Robert Treat <xzilla(at)users(dot)sourceforge(dot)net> |
Cc: | pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org, "Bucky Jordan" <bjordan(at)lumeta(dot)com>, "Joshua Marsh" <icub3d(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Subject: | Re: Hints proposal |
Date: | 2006-10-18 02:55:29 |
Message-ID: | 14539.1161140129@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-performance |
Robert Treat <xzilla(at)users(dot)sourceforge(dot)net> writes:
> When it happens it tends to look something like this:
> http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-performance/2006-01/msg00154.php
> Funny that for all the people who claim that improving the planner should be
> the primary goal that no one ever took interest in the above case.
Well, you didn't provide sufficient data for anyone else to reproduce
the problem ...
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | NikhilS | 2006-10-18 05:57:39 | Re: Additional stats for Relations |
Previous Message | Gavin Sherry | 2006-10-18 02:49:23 | Re: pg_internal.init is hazardous to your health |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Merlin Moncure | 2006-10-18 03:41:40 | Re: Jdbc/postgres performance |
Previous Message | Craig A. James | 2006-10-18 02:47:41 | Re: Optimization of this SQL sentence |