Re: No PL/PHP ? Any reason?

From: Brett Mc Bride <brett(dot)mcbride(at)deakin(dot)edu(dot)au>
To: Carlo Stonebanks <stonec(dot)register(at)sympatico(dot)ca>, "pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: No PL/PHP ? Any reason?
Date: 2010-06-22 03:38:24
Message-ID: 1451A17266557D4C9733B93ACC5DA5C1132D4F6E01@garnet-1.du.deakin.edu.au
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

There's this one: https://www.commandprompt.com/community/plphp/

-----Original Message-----
From: pgsql-general-owner(at)postgresql(dot)org [mailto:pgsql-general-owner(at)postgresql(dot)org] On Behalf Of Carlo Stonebanks
Sent: Tuesday, 22 June 2010 1:29 PM
To: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: [GENERAL] No PL/PHP ? Any reason?

Is there any technical obstacle to anyone creating PL/PHP? I am cruious as
to why it doesn't alreay exist. I mean, I love my Tcl support, and I know
this is part of PG's legacy... but Tcl and no PHP? I figure there's a tech
reason for this - the demand must be there! No?

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Shoaib Mir 2010-06-22 03:43:02 Re: No PL/PHP ? Any reason?
Previous Message Carlo Stonebanks 2010-06-22 03:28:57 No PL/PHP ? Any reason?