From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
Cc: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Jean-Michel Pouré <jm(at)poure(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: DELETE syntax on JOINS |
Date: | 2009-08-24 16:50:24 |
Message-ID: | 14512.1251132624@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> writes:
> Bruce Momjian wrote:
>> So the problem is that our DELETE ... USING does not allow ANSI join
>> syntax? Can that be added?
> Not sure about that. USING is already an extension to the standard, so
> if we extend it a bit more, it can't be a problem, can it?
I don't see any very good way to extend the USING syntax to allow the
target table to be outer-joined to something else. Some other systems
allow it by letting you re-specify the target in the other clause,
equivalently to
DELETE FROM target t USING t LEFT JOIN other_table ot ON ...
but we have always considered that the target is *not* to be identified
with any member of the FROM/USING clause, so it would be a serious
compatibility break to change that now.
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Sam Mason | 2009-08-24 16:54:08 | Re: Bug in date arithmetic |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2009-08-24 16:46:46 | Re: Bug in date arithmetic |