=?GBK?B?tcK45w==?= <digoal(at)126(dot)com> writes:
> At 2016-09-27 21:04:34, "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>> Can't reproduce that on the basis of the given information.
> $ git clone https://github.com/postgrespro/pg_pathman
> ...
If it requires pathman, and apparently not even the default settings for
that, I'd say this is a pathman bug. It looks a bit like the partitions
are getting processed despite the plan claiming they aren't.
regards, tom lane