From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | pgsql(at)mohawksoft(dot)com, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: 8.0.X and the ARC patent |
Date: | 2005-02-19 05:57:52 |
Message-ID: | 14489.1108792672@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>> Still to be determined: what we lose in extra I/O from the presumably
>> less efficient cache management; also what sort of slowdown occurs on
>> a single-CPU machine that isn't going to get any benefit from the
>> increased amount of lock management. But it looks promising.
> Yea, that was one of my questions --- the new buffer locking helps SMP,
> but how much does it hurt single-cpu machines?
So far I've not been able to measure any consistent difference, but you
know how much I trust pgbench ;-). I hope that Mark Wong can give us
some results on the OSDL setup soon.
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Manuel Sugawara | 2005-02-19 06:21:35 | problems with locale settings |
Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2005-02-19 04:47:40 | Re: Help me recovering data |