Re: [BUGS] 8.0: Absolute path required for INITDB?

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
Cc: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-patches <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [BUGS] 8.0: Absolute path required for INITDB?
Date: 2004-08-16 16:21:32
Message-ID: 14475.1092673292@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-bugs pgsql-patches

Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> writes:
> Rather I would ask why we changed the
> description-loading routine in version 1.7 of initdb.c to use a copy
> from file instead of what happens everywhere else where initdb loads the
> file and feeds it to the postgres stdin?

That was to avoid a Windows-only newline problem. Don't complain too
hard.

You are in any case missing the point: -L is a useless switch and there
is no reason to make it easy to use. (I don't think I have ever once
had occasion to use it in all the years I've worked on Postgres, and I
have certainly run initdb in orders-of-magnitude more contexts than any
ordinary user would.) If I have to waste any more time on this
discussion, I will propose solving the problem by removing the switch
entirely.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-bugs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2004-08-16 16:23:47 Re: [BUGS] 8.0: Absolute path required for INITDB?
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2004-08-16 16:20:55 Re: BUG #1208: Invalid page header

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2004-08-16 16:23:47 Re: [BUGS] 8.0: Absolute path required for INITDB?
Previous Message Andrew Dunstan 2004-08-16 16:09:12 Re: [BUGS] 8.0: Absolute path required for INITDB?