Re: Certification

From: Jean-Paul Argudo <jean-paul(at)postgresql(dot)fr>
To: Michael Meskes <meskes(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Cc: pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Certification
Date: 2015-11-02 06:57:31
Message-ID: 1446447451.2366.8.camel@postgresql.fr
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-advocacy

Hi there!

Le samedi 31 octobre 2015 à 09:57 +0100, Michael Meskes a écrit :
> But I have, see above. Just to make it clear again, there is no certification
> for PostgreSQL and PostgreSQL only with no company attached to it. It'd be
> great to have something that independent from those commercial interests.

I completely agree with Michael. And as Damien, among others wrote here,
lots of folks working for a PostgreSQL company would be very happy to
work on this community certification. And their bosses to, exactly like
we're all happy working on PostgreSQL itself or on PostgreSQL tools.

A community-driven certification for PostgreSQL itself would also lower
the work do to *and maintain* (1 major version per year, huh..) for all
company-driven certification: I think those companies would only
maintain special modules where their content differs from the community
one ?

So to me, the real interest of us *all* is having a community
certification, and this is has *also* a real commercial interest for
PostgreSQL companies.

Speaking as the Dalibo's CEO, I'd be glad our company invest time on
this project :-)

Cheers,

--
Jean-Paul Argudo

In response to

Browse pgsql-advocacy by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Josh Berkus 2015-11-02 17:57:10 Re: Certification
Previous Message Michael Meskes 2015-10-31 09:06:13 Re: Certification