From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com> |
Cc: | ITAGAKI Takahiro <itagaki(dot)takahiro(at)oss(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: rmgr hooks and contrib/rmgr_hook |
Date: | 2008-09-02 15:39:29 |
Message-ID: | 14451.1220369969@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches |
Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com> writes:
> On Tue, 2008-09-02 at 18:30 +0900, ITAGAKI Takahiro wrote:
>> How about adding a new variable "recovery_preload_libaries" like as
>> shared_preload_libraries? Rmgr libs in it are loaded only in startup
>> process and only if recovery is needed.
> Good point. If others agree, I will re-implement this way.
Aside from the objections raised by Heikki, I'm not seeing the use-case
for an rmgr that only executes during recovery; in fact I'm not entirely
sure that I see a use-case for this entire patch. Where are the WAL
records that the "loadable rmgr" processes going to come from?
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2008-09-02 15:40:31 | Re: What is d2mdir? |
Previous Message | Gregory Stark | 2008-09-02 15:37:37 | Re: Question regarding the database page layout. |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2008-09-02 16:02:05 | Re: WIP Join Removal |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2008-09-02 15:35:36 | Re: WIP Join Removal |