Re: Larger volumes of chronologically ordered data and the planner

John Moran <johnfrederickmoran(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> What is PostgreSQL's likely behaviour when it encounters a large
> volume of data that is chronologically ordered (there's a btree index
> on a date column)? Is postgreSQL intelligent enough to discern that
> since the most frequently accessed data is invariably recent data,
> that it should store only that in memory, and efficiently store less
> relevant, older data on disk (the volume of data in production at the
> moment is still small enough to fit entirely in memory)?

There's no dedicated intelligence about such a case, but I don't see why
the ordinary cache management algorithms won't handle it perfectly well.

regards, tom lane