Re: BUG #18722: Processing arrays with plpgsql raises errors

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Dean Rasheed <dean(dot)a(dot)rasheed(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: exclusion(at)gmail(dot)com, pgsql-bugs(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: BUG #18722: Processing arrays with plpgsql raises errors
Date: 2024-11-25 19:16:11
Message-ID: 1440980.1732562171@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-bugs

Dean Rasheed <dean(dot)a(dot)rasheed(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> I didn't mean do it in all cases, I just meant the NullIfExpr case
> identified here. My point was that instead of modifying the evaluation
> code for EEOP_NULLIF to make it call
> MakeExpandedObjectReadOnlyInternal(), it would be easier to insert a
> EEOP_MAKE_READONLY step for the first argument of the EEOP_NULLIF
> step.

But then the NULLIF step would only have access to the R/O pointer,
no? We do want to pass on a R/W pointer to the output, if we got
one, to handle cases like
fconsumer(NULLIF(fproducer(...), ...), ...)
Admittedly that's a pretty edgy edge-case, but still we're leaving
money on the table if we don't do it. So I think we have to deal
with the issue within NULLIF.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-bugs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Thomas Munro 2024-11-25 19:51:21 Re: Build failure with GCC 15 (defaults to -std=gnu23)
Previous Message Vallimaharajan G 2024-11-25 18:27:07 [Bug] Heap Use After Free in parallel_vacuum_reset_dead_items Function