From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> |
Cc: | Postgresql Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: massive quotes? |
Date: | 2003-08-31 23:17:59 |
Message-ID: | 144.1062371879@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> writes:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>> I'm also wondering why the backend need have anything at all to do with
>> an improved function-definition mode. If you look in the archives you
>> will see speculation about inventing psql backslash commands that would
>> assist in entering raw function definitions by taking something you type
>> and suitably quotifying it.
> This would suit my needs, as I use psql to do my db setup. But it would
> introduce a possible disconnect between psql and other interfaces, e.g.
> pgadmin, wouldn't it? Might it not be better to do something that was at
> least available to all clients, rather than make them all have to do
> their own quote escaping?
What makes you think that a COPY-based interface would be especially
convenient for other frontends? In my mind this is entirely a
user-interface matter, and as such is best solved at the user interface.
psql has one set of needs, but a GUI app has totally different ones.
I believe phpPgAdmin and so forth already have their own solutions to
the quoting problem, anyway.
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Andrew Dunstan | 2003-08-31 23:59:23 | Re: massive quotes? |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2003-08-31 23:10:18 | Re: "is_superuser" parameter creates inconsistencies |