| From: | twoflower <standa(dot)kurik(at)gmail(dot)com> | 
|---|---|
| To: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org | 
| Subject: | SELECT blocks UPDATE | 
| Date: | 2015-08-13 13:39:42 | 
| Message-ID: | 1439473182689-5862040.post@n5.nabble.com | 
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email | 
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general | 
Hello,
if I am reading  the documentation on explicit locking
<http://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/interactive/explicit-locking.html#LOCKING-TABLES>  
correctly, SELECT should never conflict with UPDATE. However, what I am
observing as a result of this monitoring query: 
SELECT bl.pid AS blocked_pid,
    a.usename              AS blocked_user,
    ka.query               AS blocking_statement,
    now() - ka.query_start AS blocking_duration,
    kl.pid                 AS blocking_pid,
    ka.usename             AS blocking_user,
    a.query                AS blocked_statement,
    now() - a.query_start  AS blocked_duration
FROM pg_catalog.pg_locks bl
JOIN pg_catalog.pg_stat_activity a ON a.pid = bl.pid
JOIN pg_catalog.pg_locks kl ON kl.transactionid = bl.transactionid AND
kl.pid != bl.pid
JOIN pg_catalog.pg_stat_activity ka ON ka.pid = kl.pid
WHERE NOT bl.granted;
is this
*Blocking statement*: SELECT tmtranslat0_.id as id164_0_, tmtranslat1_.id as
id101_1_, tmlanguage2_.id as id73_2_, ... FROM "TRANSLATION" ...
*Blocked statement*: UPDATE "TRANSLATION" SET fk_assignment_queue_item =
1000211 WHERE id IN (47032216)
I don't remember ever having problems with things like this. I am not even
issuing SQL queries in parallel from my application (the execution is
single-threaded). Now my application is stuck on the UPDATE statement. 
1) How is it possible that these two statements block?
2) What can I do about it?
Thank you.
--
View this message in context: http://postgresql.nabble.com/SELECT-blocks-UPDATE-tp5862040.html
Sent from the PostgreSQL - general mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Melvin Davidson | 2015-08-13 13:46:49 | Re: PostgreSQL - The Best Overall Database | 
| Previous Message | John McKown | 2015-08-13 13:21:44 | Re: PostgreSQL - The Best Overall Database |