Re: Document parameter count limit

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: "David G(dot) Johnston" <david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Justin Pryzby <pryzby(at)telsasoft(dot)com>, Corey Huinker <corey(dot)huinker(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Document parameter count limit
Date: 2023-10-26 23:21:24
Message-ID: 1438822.1698362484@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

"David G. Johnston" <david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> Cleanups for consistency:

> Move "identifier length" after "partition keys" (before the new "function
> arguments")

Yeah, the existing ordering of this table seems quite random.
That would help some, by separating items having to do with
database/table size from SQL-query-related limits.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jeff Davis 2023-10-26 23:27:10 Re: Does UCS_BASIC have the right CTYPE?
Previous Message David G. Johnston 2023-10-26 23:17:19 Re: Document parameter count limit