Re: Support for N synchronous standby servers - take 2

From: Beena Emerson <memissemerson(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Support for N synchronous standby servers - take 2
Date: 2015-08-04 06:27:35
Message-ID: 1438669655412-5860758.post@n5.nabble.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Michael Paquier wrote:
> And this is the case of any format as well. String format validation
> for a GUC occurs when server is reloaded or restarted, one advantage
> of JSON is that the parser validator is already here, so we don't need
> to reinvent a new machinery for that.

IIUC correctly, we would also have to add additional code to check that that
given JSON has the required keys and entries. For ex: The "group" mentioned
in the "s_s_names" should be definied in the "groups" section, etc.

-----
Beena Emerson

--
View this message in context: http://postgresql.nabble.com/Support-for-N-synchronous-standby-servers-take-2-tp5849384p5860758.html
Sent from the PostgreSQL - hackers mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Michael Paquier 2015-08-04 06:33:40 Re: tablecmds.c and lock hierarchy
Previous Message Michael Paquier 2015-08-04 06:05:21 Re: Support for N synchronous standby servers - take 2