Re: EXPLAIN ANALYZE

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: "Simon Riggs" <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: "Gregory Stark" <stark(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, "Neil Conway" <neilc(at)samurai(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: EXPLAIN ANALYZE
Date: 2006-12-11 18:18:27
Message-ID: 14381.1165861107@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

"Simon Riggs" <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> writes:
> On Mon, 2006-12-11 at 11:00 +0000, Gregory Stark wrote:
>> What I suggested was introducing a new FE/BE message type for analyze query
>> plans.

> I like the idea, but its more work than I really wanted to get into
> right now.

Yeah ... a protocol change is *painful*, especially if you really want
clients to behave in a significantly new way.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Neil Conway 2006-12-11 18:23:48 Re: EXPLAIN ANALYZE
Previous Message Tom Lane 2006-12-11 18:05:24 Re: Vacuum, analyze, and setting reltuples of pg_class