From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Stephan Szabo <sszabo(at)megazone23(dot)bigpanda(dot)com> |
Cc: | pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Get constrrelid for fk constraints that lost it |
Date: | 2002-10-03 21:17:37 |
Message-ID: | 14377.1033679857@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-patches |
Stephan Szabo <sszabo(at)megazone23(dot)bigpanda(dot)com> writes:
>> I was inclined to think it should take the constraint and let the
>> failure occur at runtime. A NOTICE would be okay but not an ERROR.
> That's easy enough to do (changing a a false to true and an ERROR
> to NOTICE I believe)
OK, applied this second version of the patch (with some minor cleanups).
If CREATE TRIGGER is unable to resolve the missing FROM clause, you get
something like
psql:r72.dump:81: NOTICE: Unable to find table for constraint "<unnamed>"
while loading the dump, and then
z=# insert into zot values(22);
ERROR: No target table given for trigger "RI_ConstraintTrigger_149654" on "zot"
Remove these RI triggers and do ALTER TABLE ADD CONSTRAINT
z=#
when the trigger is fired (instead of "Relation 0 unknown").
If anyone's got an idea for a better one-liner hint for that error message,
I'm open to suggestions.
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2002-10-03 21:29:47 | Re: DROP COLUMN misbehaviour with multiple inheritance |
Previous Message | Tino Wildenhain | 2002-10-03 20:35:08 | Re: [HACKERS] Anyone want to assist with the |