Re: perm bug ?

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: ivan <iv(at)psycho(dot)pl>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: perm bug ?
Date: 2003-07-24 02:13:01
Message-ID: 14374.1059012781@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

ivan <iv(at)psycho(dot)pl> writes:
> I think when i create function , the default grant should be only for
> owner. specialy when function have security definer .

We did it that way to begin with, but the definition did not survive
its first beta cycle ... too inconvenient.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Christopher Kings-Lynne 2003-07-24 02:14:10 contrib compilation probs
Previous Message Tom Lane 2003-07-24 02:10:04 Re: locking mechanism