| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Dmitriy Igrishin <dmitigr(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: libpq |
| Date: | 2010-08-12 15:04:52 |
| Message-ID: | 14368.1281625492@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-sql |
Dmitriy Igrishin <dmitigr(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> Is it guaranteed that functions, which accept PGconn* (PGresult*)
> properly works if PGconn* (PGresult*) is NULL or is it better to check
> on NULL the value of the pointer before calling those functions?
I think they all do check for NULL, but whether they give back a default
result that's useful for you is harder to say.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Dmitriy Igrishin | 2010-08-12 15:32:50 | libpq and TOO MANY CONNECTIONS |
| Previous Message | Dmitriy Igrishin | 2010-08-12 14:47:42 | libpq |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | John Fabiani | 2010-08-16 14:52:57 | need to debug |
| Previous Message | Dmitriy Igrishin | 2010-08-12 14:47:42 | libpq |