Re: Vacuum

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: "Summer S(dot) Wilson" <collectonian(at)eclectic-world(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Vacuum
Date: 2001-10-08 16:03:54
Message-ID: 1433.1002557034@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-admin

"Summer S. Wilson" <collectonian(at)eclectic-world(dot)com> writes:
> I'm running PostgreSQL 7.1 with Slackware 8 on a dual processor Dell server.
> I have a database with 17 tables. I started VacuumDB with the analyze
> option on Friday around 3pm...when I came in this morning at 8 it was still
> not done. From the verbose info, it seems to be "stuck" on one table,
> whowrote which is the second largest table (2546 records).

Is it consuming CPU time, or just sitting? (ps or top would tell you)
If it's just sitting, I'd bet that there is some other connected backend
that's holding an open transaction with a lock on that table.

regards, tom lane

In response to

  • Vacuum at 2001-10-08 14:37:48 from Summer S. Wilson

Responses

  • Re: Vacuum at 2001-10-09 07:45:47 from Ariunbold Gerelt-Od

Browse pgsql-admin by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Nick Fankhauser 2001-10-08 16:07:40 Re: buffer overflow (I'm getting it too!)
Previous Message Stephan Szabo 2001-10-08 16:00:54 Re: buffer overflow (I'm getting it too!)