Re: BUG #1145: silent REVOKE failures

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Fabien COELHO <coelho(at)cri(dot)ensmp(dot)fr>
Cc: pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
Subject: Re: BUG #1145: silent REVOKE failures
Date: 2004-05-01 15:39:52
Message-ID: 14322.1083425992@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-bugs

Fabien COELHO <coelho(at)cri(dot)ensmp(dot)fr> writes:
> Well, if I issue a "REVOKE" and the rights are not revoked and could never
> have been because I have no right to issue such statement on the object, I
> tend to call this deep absence of success a "failure".

> If I do the very opposite GRANT, I have a clear "permission denied".

Oh, I thought you were complaining that revoking rights not previously
granted should be an error. I agree with the above; in fact it's a
duplicate of a previous complaint.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-bugs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Ted Kremenek 2004-05-02 18:05:38 [CHECKER] 4 memory leaks in Postgresql 7.4.2
Previous Message Fabien COELHO 2004-05-01 09:23:08 Re: BUG #1145: silent REVOKE failures