Re: CLogControlLock

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Paul van den Bogaard <Paul(dot)Vandenbogaard(at)Sun(dot)COM>
Cc: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: CLogControlLock
Date: 2008-04-08 03:18:04
Message-ID: 14310.1207624684@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Paul van den Bogaard <Paul(dot)Vandenbogaard(at)Sun(dot)COM> writes:
> just started with 8.4 devel. Still focussing on LWlocks. With the
> same load (#users & benchmarktool) I now see LockID 11
> (CLogControlLock) to be in the top waiting list.

> This one was never noticable in 8.3.

> Did anything change with respect to this?

Uh, no, 8.4 devel has hardly started and I can't think of any changes
we've applied that would be likely to change the load on
CLogControlLock. What is your test case?

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2008-04-08 03:33:35 Re: pgsql: Implement a few changes to how shared libraries and dynamically
Previous Message Tom Lane 2008-04-08 03:08:01 Re: COPY Transform support