Re: [prefix] prefix92 conflict with another version of prefix (#11)

From: Devrim Gündüz <devrim(at)gunduz(dot)org>
To: Christoph Berg <cb(at)df7cb(dot)de>
Cc: dimitri/prefix <reply+000f9784f17d6eae3ed6dc39aeb2dd80f4de84c3890eae0a92cf000000011151bc0a92a169ce043594c0(at)reply(dot)github(dot)com>, PGDG RPM Packages <pgsql-pkg-yum(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [prefix] prefix92 conflict with another version of prefix (#11)
Date: 2015-04-27 05:11:46
Message-ID: 1430111506.2008.36.camel@gunduz.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-pkg-yum


Hi,

On Fri, 2015-04-24 at 10:37 +0200, Christoph Berg wrote:
> > If I can have several postgresql versions running is same machine
> (testing purpose), why can't I have also prefix installed in every
> version of postgresql?
> >
> > I would like to install both: prefix92 and prefix94 in the same
> server.
>

> the RPM packages are built by the yum.postgresql.org people (in Cc).
> The prefix.spec file in the prefix repo hasn't been updated since
> 2008.

Thanks for the report. Fixed package in 9.1+ for all supported distros.

Regards, Devrim

--
Devrim GÜNDÜZ
Principal Systems Engineer @ EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
PostgreSQL Danışmanı/Consultant, Red Hat Certified Engineer
Twitter: @DevrimGunduz , @DevrimGunduzTR

In response to

Browse pgsql-pkg-yum by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message david.turon 2015-04-27 10:03:10 Wrong paths in init script slony1-94-2.2.3-1.rhel6.x86_64
Previous Message Christoph Berg 2015-04-24 08:37:17 Re: [prefix] prefix92 conflict with another version of prefix (#11)