Re: One less footgun: deprecating pg_dump -d

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: "Kevin Grittner" <Kevin(dot)Grittner(at)wicourts(dot)gov>
Cc: "Magnus Hagander" <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com, "Greg Sabino Mullane" <greg(at)endpoint(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: One less footgun: deprecating pg_dump -d
Date: 2009-03-09 19:48:36
Message-ID: 14273.1236628116@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

"Kevin Grittner" <Kevin(dot)Grittner(at)wicourts(dot)gov> writes:
> Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> wrote:
>> but maybe it's better to use -i and -I, and thus change them both?

> That's already used:

> -i, --ignore-version proceed even when server version mismatches
> pg_dump version

Proposal: drop the short forms of these two switches entirely.
Anybody who actually needs the capability can write "--inserts".

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andrew Dunstan 2009-03-09 19:56:02 Re: One less footgun: deprecating pg_dump -d
Previous Message Kevin Grittner 2009-03-09 19:35:14 Re: One less footgun: deprecating pg_dump -d