Re: VACUUM FULL doesn't reduce table size

From: pinker <pinker(at)onet(dot)eu>
To: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: VACUUM FULL doesn't reduce table size
Date: 2015-03-09 16:05:07
Message-ID: 1425917107408-5841137.post@n5.nabble.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general


> So there are no longer any dead rows being left behind, right?
>
> Why are we still discussing this? Do you have some other question?

There are no dead rows, but postgres still cannot reuse the space because of
3043947 nonremovable row versions ..

INFO: vacuuming "my_table"
INFO: "my_table": found 0 removable, 3043947 nonremovable row versions in
37580 pages
DETAIL: 0 dead row versions cannot be removed yet.
CPU 2.67s/1.59u sec elapsed 7.71 sec.
Query returned successfully with no result in 8319 ms.

--
View this message in context: http://postgresql.nabble.com/VACUUM-FULL-doesn-t-reduce-table-size-tp5840782p5841137.html
Sent from the PostgreSQL - general mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bill Moran 2015-03-09 16:19:21 Re: VACUUM FULL doesn't reduce table size
Previous Message Adrian Klaver 2015-03-09 15:57:17 Re: VACUUM FULL doesn't reduce table size