From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Álvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org> |
Cc: | Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Kyotaro HORIGUCHI <horiguchi(dot)kyotaro(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>, Fujii Masao <fujii(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Race condition in InvalidateObsoleteReplicationSlots() |
Date: | 2021-06-19 19:16:50 |
Message-ID: | 1425810.1624130210@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
=?utf-8?Q?=C3=81lvaro?= Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org> writes:
> It occurred to me that this could be made better by sigstopping both
> walreceiver and walsender, then letting only the latter run; AFAICS this
> makes the test stable. I'll register this on the upcoming commitfest to
> let cfbot run it, and if it looks good there I'll get it pushed to
> master. If there's any problem I'll just remove it before beta2 is
> stamped.
Hmm ... desmoxytes has failed this test once, out of four runs since
it went in:
https://buildfarm.postgresql.org/cgi-bin/show_log.pl?nm=desmoxytes&dt=2021-06-19%2003%3A06%3A04
None of the other animals that have reported in so far are unhappy.
Still, maybe that's not a track record we want to have for beta2?
I've just launched a run on gaur, which given its dinosaur status
might be the most likely animal to have an actual portability problem
with this test technique. If you want to wait a few hours to see what
it says, that'd be fine with me.
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | AJG | 2021-06-19 20:38:58 | Re: a path towards replacing GEQO with something better |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2021-06-19 16:35:26 | Re: unnesting multirange data types |