Re: autovacuum worker running amok - and me too ;)

From: wambacher <wnordmann(at)gmx(dot)de>
To: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: autovacuum worker running amok - and me too ;)
Date: 2015-03-06 10:44:15
Message-ID: 1425638655239-5840781.post@n5.nabble.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

Karsten Hilbert wrote
> Of course, I am
> not suggesting you provide 48GB of swap and your problem is
> magically solved _but_ one thing we might take away from that
> old adage is that one might "hope things to work better"
> (say, while debugging) if there is at least as much swap as
> there is physical RAM based on the naive assumption that in
> this case '"everything" can be swapped out'.

no problem at all, got TBytes of free Diskpace.

--
View this message in context: http://postgresql.nabble.com/autovacuum-worker-running-amok-and-me-too-tp5840299p5840781.html
Sent from the PostgreSQL - general mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message pinker 2015-03-06 10:59:45 VACUUM FULL doesn't reduce table size
Previous Message Karsten Hilbert 2015-03-06 10:16:38 Re: autovacuum worker running amok - and me too ;)