Re: PostgreSQL and memory usage

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: "scott(dot)marlowe" <scott(dot)marlowe(at)ihs(dot)com>
Cc: Dann Corbit <DCorbit(at)connx(dot)com>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org, pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: PostgreSQL and memory usage
Date: 2003-01-07 17:09:21
Message-ID: 14256.1041959361@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general pgsql-hackers pgsql-performance

"scott.marlowe" <scott(dot)marlowe(at)ihs(dot)com> writes:
> Then do the old pg_ctl reload and you should be cooking with gas.

One correction: altering the number of shared buffers requires an actual
postmaster restart.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Eisentraut 2003-01-07 17:40:33 Re: Have people taken a look at pgdiff yet?
Previous Message scott.marlowe 2003-01-07 16:55:30 Re: PostgreSQL and memory usage

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2003-01-07 17:10:02 Re: IPv6 patch
Previous Message Tom Lane 2003-01-07 17:07:05 Re: IPv6 patch

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2003-01-07 17:44:16 Re: [SQL] [PERFORM] 7.3.1 index use / performance
Previous Message scott.marlowe 2003-01-07 16:55:30 Re: PostgreSQL and memory usage