Re: Closing some 8.4 open items

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
Cc: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Closing some 8.4 open items
Date: 2009-04-08 16:44:24
Message-ID: 14247.1239209064@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> writes:
> What about seq scans?

If the kernel can't read-ahead a seqscan by itself, it's unlikely to
be smart enough to be helped by posix_fadvise ... or at least so I
would think. Do you have reason to think differently?

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Chris Browne 2009-04-08 16:53:18 Re: A renewed plea for inclusion of zone.tab
Previous Message Josh Berkus 2009-04-08 16:40:53 Re: Closing some 8.4 open items