| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Dave Page <dpage(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Cc: | PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: [Fwd: PGBuildfarm member narwhal Branch HEAD Status changed from OK to InstallCheck failure] |
| Date: | 2007-04-27 14:05:34 |
| Message-ID: | 14242.1177682734@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Dave Page <dpage(at)postgresql(dot)org> writes:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>> Is this the same physical machine as narwhal?
> Yes, it is. It's an FC6 box running VMWare server, with a Win 2k3r2 VM
> and a Vista ultimate VM, both with mingw and msvc animals.
> I'm still not convinced it's a hardware problem - aside from the fact
> that it's the same error every time (although, I note in this case it
> was in check, not installcheck), I would expect at least one of SMART,
> FC6, VMware or 2k3/Vista to spot that there was a problem. I have also
> recreated the virtual disks of both VMs since this started happening. I
> wonder if we're hitting some odd bug in VMware.
I concur it's too regular to be a hardware issue. The VMware idea is
a bit plausible though. If that's it, we ought to see failures of this
ilk on all four animals sooner or later ...
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2007-04-27 14:05:43 | Re: Avoiding unnecessary reads in recovery |
| Previous Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2007-04-27 13:55:24 | Re: Fwd: How does the partitioned lock manager works? |