Re: PGDG repo differences for RHEL 6.6 / 7.

From: Devrim Gündüz <devrim(at)gunduz(dot)org>
To: "Graeme B(dot) Bell" <grb(at)skogoglandskap(dot)no>
Cc: "pgsql-pkg-yum(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-pkg-yum(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: PGDG repo differences for RHEL 6.6 / 7.
Date: 2015-02-03 10:58:50
Message-ID: 1422961130.14827.10.camel@gunduz.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-pkg-yum


Hi Graeme,

On Mon, 2015-02-02 at 13:47 +0000, Graeme B. Bell wrote:

> - Do you think there is any possibility that the PGDG RHEL6 builds
> could be updated to gdal 1.11 to match the RHEL7 branch?

No. That will break RHEL 6. (I am also an EPEL packager, and I know what
it feels to push such an update to RHEL ...)

> - It seems that there is no "BIGTIFF" support in the PGDG GDAL in
> RHEL6.
> This is strange because BIGTIFF has been supported since GDAL 1.4.4
> (2007).
> That means that raster sizes are limited to 4GB which is pretty small
> for anyone doing national level work.
>
> Is there any reason that the BIGTIFF option isn't supported or could
> it be enabled in future builds?
> Perhaps the person who is building is not using libtiff or has
> disabled it?

AFAICS, libtiff > 4.0 is required for BIGTIFF support, and RHEL 6 has
libtiff 3.9.4. Again, AFAICS, GDAL's configure can pick BIGTIFF support
automagically when it finds the related version of libtiff. I suppose
RHEL 7 has this support.

Regards,
--
Devrim GÜNDÜZ
Principal Systems Engineer @ EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
PostgreSQL Danışmanı/Consultant, Red Hat Certified Engineer
Twitter: @DevrimGunduz , @DevrimGunduzTR

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-pkg-yum by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Graeme B. Bell 2015-02-03 11:51:24 Re: PGDG repo differences for RHEL 6.6 / 7.
Previous Message David Markham 2015-02-03 03:35:15 Unable to create postgis 2.1.5 extension in PG9.2.8/rhel6